Bibliometric analysis explores research trends and hot spots in diabetic foot ulcer studies, suggesting insights for future investigations.
Objectives: Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) represents a common and severe complication of diabetes, posing a substantial risk factor for amputation. The amount of research publications on DFU has been increasing year by year Over the past decade. A bibliometric analysis was carried out to explore the tendencies, frontiers, and hot spots of global scientific output in DFU research during the past decade. Methods: This study comprehensively retrieved publications and recorded information spanning from 2014 to 2023, utilizing the expansive Science Citation Index (SCI-Expanded) within the prestigious Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC), ensuring a comprehensive overview of research trends over the past decade. Utilizing VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and We Chat online tools, we performed a comprehensive bibliometric and visualization analysis, investigating the annual output trends, leading nations, active institutions, journals, prominent authors, co-cited references, and key terms that characterize the overall distribution of research in the field. Results: Overall, we acquired 6775 articles and reviews, with a notable rise in the yearly count of publications dedicated to DFU research over the preceding ten years. The USA led in both the number of publications and achieved the highest H-index and citation count., showcasing their dominance in the field. Texas University System and the International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds emerged as the most prolific institutions and periodicals, respectively, in terms of output. Armstrong.DG.‘s 2017 paper garnered a total Global Citation Score (GCS) of 1711, securing the top spot among its peers. The most frequently occurring keywords included “diabetic foot,” “diabetic foot ulcer”, “management”, “risk-factors”, and “care.” This study indicates that the publication volume related to DFU is on the rise. The top three contributor authors were Armstrong, David G., Lavery, Lawrence A., and Van Netten, Jaap. Emerging research hotspots encompassed “epidermal growth factor,” “wound care,” “nanoparticles”, “ulcer recurrence”, “IWGDF guidance”, and “skin temperature”, indicating the dynamic progress of new technologies and methods in the field of DFU treatment. Conclusions: Our analysis illuminated the prevailing research hotspots and evolving trends in the DFU over the last ten years. Grasping the pivotal indicators (researchers, nations, institutions, journals, etc.) and research hotspots in DFU can empower scholars with a deeper understanding of the field and foster insights into prospective research avenues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: