Pharmacoeconomic evaluation reveals cost-effectiveness of amlodipine and metformin for hypertension and T2DM, indicating effective treatment options.
Hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are chronic conditions requiring long-term pharmacotherapy, placing significant financial pressure on patients and healthcare systems. Drug selection should prioritize both clinical efficacy and cost-efficiency, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study conducted a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of commonly used therapies at RSUD Berkah Pandeglang using a retrospective, non-experimental design. Data were collected from 2023 outpatient records and analyzed from the hospital’s perspective. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using the Average Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ACER). For hypertension, amlodipine (n=20) had a lower ACER (Rp 283,913) than candesartan (n=15; Rp 883,000), indicating higher cost-effectiveness. In T2DM patients, metformin (n=25) was more cost-effective (ACER: Rp 317,746.75) than glimepiride (n=25; ACER: Rp 607,148.84). These findings support prioritizing amlodipine and metformin as first-line treatments in similar public healthcare settings to improve therapeutic outcomes while managing costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yusransyah et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: