Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study evaluates endocan levels in peri-implant tissues, suggesting diagnostic potential for peri-implantitis.
Objective This investigation evaluates Endothelial Cell-Specific Molecule-1 (Endocan), an endothelial-derived protein, for its capacity to discriminate between healthy and pathological peri-implant tissues and its diagnostic potential in peri-implant disease. Materials and methods This cross-sectional investigation analyzed 62 peri-implant sites from 62 individuals, including 31 healthy sites, chosen according to clinical and radiographic parameters based on 2017 consensus recommendations. Collection of peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) utilized paper point methodology, with Endocan quantification performed through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques. Statistical analysis included multivariable linear regression models to evaluate associations between disease status and Endocan levels, adjusting for demographic factors. Results Endocan levels demonstrated a clear disease progression pattern. Healthy sites showed the lowest levels (643.66 ± 128.49 ng/L), while peri-implantitis sites exhibited significantly elevated concentrations (841.83 ± 62.72 ng/L, p < 0.001). Peri-implant mucositis sites (671.99 ± 133.00 ng/L) were not significantly different from healthy sites ( p = 0.757). Modeling demonstrated that peri-implantitis exhibited significant correlation with increased Endocan concentrations (B = 187.74, p < 0.001), while peri-implant mucositis showed no significant association ( p = 0.431). Additionally, younger age, female sex, and smoking were independently associated with higher Endocan concentrations. Conclusions Endocan demonstrates specificity as a biomarker for peri-implantitis, showing capacity to differentiate advanced peri-implant pathology from healthy tissues and peri-implant mucositis. These results suggest Endocan’s potential utility for disease staging and monitoring in peri-implant care, providing a foundation for biomarker-based diagnostic approaches in implant dentistry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Awad et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: