Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conversation analysis reveals how claiming authenticity impacts epistemic authority in Filipino identity discourse.
This article investigates the negotiation of authenticity and authority through conversation analysis of a post on an online Filipino forum and two interactions from its comment section. I first review literature relating to sociolinguistic authenticity and authority, which are supposedly in conflict, and epistemic authority. I argue that epistemic authority validates is intimately connected to authenticating oneself as a valid member of an identity group. I then look at the Philippine context, such as authentication in relation to the conyo, a supposedly fake and English dominant Filipino that serves as the foil to a real, authentic Filipino. Close conversation analysis of a Reddit post and its comments regarding conyo identity demonstrates how claiming authenticity means claiming epistemic authority and vice versa.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eduardo Salinas Lactaoen (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: