PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi (MBUD)0 citationsOpen Access

An Assessment on Temporary Post-Disaster Shelters

View Full Paper
EAEzgi Dadaş ArıkanZİZeynep Yeşim İlerisoy

Key Points

  • The evaluation highlights the success of modular systems in providing effective temporary shelters after disasters.
  • Shiftpod emerged as the top design based on established criteria, while Icosa Village Pods ranked second in performance.
  • An analysis was conducted using 20 emergency shelter units categorized by construction types to identify strengths and weaknesses.
  • The study finds that existing shelters fail to meet comfort and cost requirements, indicating a need for improvement.

Abstract

Considering the destructive effects of disasters on cities and societies, the stages of disaster prevention and mitigation are gaining prominence. Temporary shelters are a basic requirement of disaster and emergency planning. This study aims to investigate the strengths and aspects that need improvement of the shelters used in the post-disaster phase. The research consists of two stages. In the first stage, to conduct an analysis based on construction systems, 20 emergency shelter unit examples were selected from the literature review. The designs were categorised according to construction, membrane-based, compact, modular, and traditional construction systems. In the second stage, effective design criteria were established in consideration of the literature review. Shiftpod, one of the membrane systems, was the most successful design in meeting the criteria, while Icosa Village Pods, one of the modular systems, came second in the evaluation. As a result of the review, the potential of modular systems was emphasized. The shelters in the project and prototype stages were found to be inadequate in terms of comfort and cost.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arıkan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1a26954b1d3bfb60dd8edhttps://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1587704
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evrensel Tasarım Bakış Açısıyla Acil Durum Barınaklarında İç Mekân Ergonomisi2022 · 4 citations
  2. 2A Review of Nader Khalili Shelter Design Thoughts from the Sustainability2022 · 4 citations
  3. 3Making the Temporary Shelter a ‘Home’. Transitional Housing in Chile and Peru2015 · 3 citations
  4. 4YAŞLI AFETZEDELERİN GEÇİCİ BARINMA İHTİYAÇLARININ KARŞILANMASI ÜZERİNE ÖRNEK BİR ÇALIŞMA: KAHRAMANMARAŞ-ELBİSTAN PREFABRİK HUZUREVİ KOMPLEKSİ2018 · 8 citations
  5. 5Developing a Model for Community Involvement in Post-Disaster Housing Programs2007 · 11 citations