Implementation of SDLMI shows mixed effects on self-determination and positive outcomes in goal attainment for students, implying need for further research.
Self-determination is linked to enhanced in-school and post-school outcomes for students with disabilities. Emerging research has shown the benefits of implementing self-determination interventions in general education classrooms to promote goal attainment and self-determination outcomes for all students. However, more research is needed to explore the long-term effects of self-determination interventions. In this study, we examined the growth trajectory of student self-determination in secondary general education classes over two academic semesters within the context of teacher implementation of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction (SDLMI), a research-based self-determination intervention. We also explored the relationship between self-determination and goal attainment outcomes over one academic semester. Results showed no significant change in average student self-determination scores over two academic semesters. However, students showed different patterns of change in their self-determination. Academic goal attainment was positively associated with the end of semester self-determination when implementing the SDLMI. The limitations of this study and implications for addressing the complexities of implementing self-determination interventions in general education classrooms for all students, especially students with disabilities, are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alsaeed et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: