Case studies reveal how economic and regulatory frameworks influence marginal and mature resources in three countries.
This article delves into the lifecycle of oil and gas fields and the associatedeconomic and regulatory frameworks in these three countries. Initially, it defineskey terms such as mature provinces, fields, and marginal accumulations. The articlepresents case studies from Nigeria, Angola, and Brazil, highlighting the specificlegal and fiscal incentives that influence the development and sustainability of thesefields. In Nigeria, the focus is on the historical context and regulatorydevelopments that shape the classification and management of mature andmarginal fields. Angola's case study examines the impact of new incentivesintroduced to revitalize marginal fields and explores the challenges posed by thelack of legal clarity. The Brazilian context provides insights into howcomprehensive legal frameworks, such as the Petroleum Law, support theexploration and production of mature and marginal resources. The articleemphasizes the importance of technological innovation, regulatory clarity,government incentives, scientific research, publications and internationalcooperation in optimising production and ensuring sustainable development. Itunderscores the need for research-guided continuous adaptation of technical andlegal frameworks to address evolving industry dynamics and environmentalconsiderations, advocating for a balanced approach that integrates economic,social, and environmental goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pereira et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: