Analysis uncovers legal and policy challenges for nature-based solutions to climate change, highlighting agency coordination issues.
The idea of nature-based solutions (NbS) to climate change has gained significantattention and support in recent years. These solutions focus on using naturalecosystems and processes to mitigate and adapt to the impacts of climate change,such as reforestation, wetland restoration, and sustainable agriculture practices.However, the implementation of nature-based solutions faces several legal, policy,and the administrative challenges of coordinating. These challenges include theneed for clear and consistent regulations, the allocation of rights andresponsibilities, the integration of nature-based solutions into existing legalframeworks. This paper adopted the approach of analyzing case studies fromdifferent countries to identify the key legal and policy barriers that hinder thewidespread adoption of nature-based solutions. The findings revealed that one ofthe main challenges is the lack of coordination among different governmentagencies responsible for implementing nature-based solutions. This often leads toconflicting regulations and a lack of clarity on the roles and responsibilities of eachagency. The paper highlights the need for stronger legal frameworks that prioritizeand incentivize nature-based solutions, as well as the importance of engaging localcommunities and stakeholders in the decision-making process to ensure successfulimplementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pereira et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: