Retrospective cohort reveals 43.2% of cesarean sections met ≤30-minute response time, highlighting workflow delays.
BACKGROUND: Maternal and neonatal mortality remain significant global health concerns. Category I cesarean sections are performed in life-threatening obstetric emergencies, with a recommended decision-to-incision interval (DII) of ≤30 minutes. AIMS: To evaluate the proportion of category I emergency cesarean sections performed < 30-minute response time at Adam Malik Hospital, Medan, and to identify factors contributing to delays. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 44 consecutively selected cases of category I emergency cesarean sections performed at Adam Malik Hospital, Medan, between January 1 and December 31, 2023. Eligible cases involved immediate threats to maternal or fetal life and had complete documentation of surgical timings. Time data including decision-to-incision interval and its components were extracted from electronic medical records and cross-validated with operating room and delivery ward logs. The primary outcome was decision-to-incision interval (DII), dichotomized at 30 minutes. Variables associated with DII (p <0.25) were included in multivariate analysis using Firth’s penalized logistic regression to account for small sample size and data separation. RESULTS: Only 43.2% of cases achieved a DII of ≤30 minutes. Multivariable analysis identified patient transfer time (AOR = 16.91, 95% CI: 2.19–358.36) and anesthesia duration (AOR = 27.21, 95% CI: 2.29–889.18) as significant predictors of delay. No significant associations were found between DII and adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Delays in patient transfer and anesthesia were the main contributors to prolonged DII in emergency cesarean sections. While these delays did not significantly impact short-term clinical outcomes, targeted improvements in emergency obstetric workflows may help hospitals meet national response time standards and enhance quality of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naufal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: