Discussion on how in vitro gametogenesis could reshape understandings of infertility and funding, suggesting social implications.
In vitro gametogenesis (IVG) is a biotechnological development which aims to replicate the process of gametogenesis outside the human body. If proven safe and effective, IVG could disrupt various social and biological norms, and create new reproductive possibilities and opportunities for those who experience infertility as a result of both social and biomedical factors. In this article we argue that the new reproductive possibilities provided by IVG, much like earlier discussions of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) dating back to the Warnock Report, highlight the importance of exploring the distinctions often made in policy terms between 'medical' and 'social' understandings of infertility, and that any access and funding decisions made on this basis require careful and critical attention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fovargue et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: