Quasi-experimental study compares topical lignocaine and intravenous lignocaine for reducing cough during extubation.
Objective: To ascertain effectiveness of topical lignocaine when compared with IV lignocaine during extubation in terms of reduction in cough. Study Design: Quasi Experimental Study. Duration and Place of Study: Anesthesiology department, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from Jul 2021 to Dec 2021. Methodology: A total of 160 patients were separated into two Groups of similar size. During the introduction of the laryngoscope in Group A, 2 puffs of 10% lignocaine were sprayed on vocal cords prior to insertion of the Endo Tracheal Tube. Approximately 10 mg of lignocaine was present in each puff. During induction, patients in Group B did not receive any lignocaine, but during extubation, 1.5-2 mg/kg IV lignocaine was administered. Results: Mean age of all patients was 37.25±13.44 years whereas mean BMI was 28.80±3.86. Gender distribution showed that 116 (72.5%) were males while 44 (27.5%) were females. There were a total of 51(31.9%) patients who developed cough while being extubated out of which 29 (26.3%) patients belonged to topical lignocaine Group and 22(27.5%) patients in IV lignocaine Group (p-value=0.309). Post-operative sore throat (p-value=0.746), dysphagia (p-value=0.990) and dysphonia (p-value=0.620) were also insignificant in two Groups. Conclusion: When compared to a global intravenous injection of 2% lignocaine, a combination of 10% lignocaine spray on the laryngeal inlet demonstrates equivalent effectiveness in minimising coughing during extubation. In two Groups, the side effects were likewise comparable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarfaraz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: