Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study shows 33.7% vaccine hesitancy in Lahore parents, highlighting misinformation and low education as key factors.
Background: Vaccine hesitancy remains a significant barrier to achieving optimal immunization coverage among young children, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Parents’ decisions in early childhood are pivotal for protecting against vaccine-preventable diseases, yet concerns over safety, misinformation, and trust continue to impact uptake. Objective: To assess the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy and identify its key contributing factors among parents of children under five in the Lahore region of Pakistan. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted over eight months in five public health facilities in Lahore. A total of 472 parents of children under five were selected using multistage systematic sampling. Data were collected through a validated, interviewer-administered questionnaire adapted from the WHO-SAGE Vaccine Hesitancy Scale. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariate logistic regression were performed using SPSS v26 to identify factors independently associated with vaccine hesitancy. Results: The prevalence of vaccine hesitancy was found to be 33.7%. The leading factors reported were social media misinformation (73.6%), concerns about vaccine side effects (68.6%), and lack of adequate information (59.1%). Multivariate analysis revealed that social media misinformation (AOR: 3.26; 95% CI: 2.12–5.03), low education (AOR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.58–3.67), and low income (AOR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.21–2.95) were significant independent predictors of hesitancy. Conclusion: Vaccine hesitancy among parents in Lahore is influenced by misinformation, socio-economic disadvantage, and trust issues. Targeted communication strategies and public education are essential to address concerns and enhance vaccine confidence at the community level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sikander et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: