Analysis shows significant increases in search queries for R-CPD and related terms, indicating rising awareness and interest.
BACKGROUND Retrograde cricopharyngeus dysfunction (R-CPD) is a recently described condition characterized by the lifelong abelchia. R-CPD remains unfamiliar to most clinicians. Comparatively, information regarding R-CPD has proliferated rapidly on the internet. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess public awareness, interest, and patterns of information-seeking behavior related to R-CPD symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment by analyzing the relative search volumes (RSV) of 24 terms related to R-CPD in the United States using the Google Trends database. METHODS Using Google Trends, data from Google Search queries from the United States related to R-CPD between January 2013 to May 2024 were obtained. The means of RSV from 2013 to 2018 were compared to RSV from 2019 (when R-CPD was officially defined) to the present. Comparisons of the RSV means between these two periods were performed using paired t-tests with p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS The mean RSV of “R-CPD” increased by 116% between 2013-2018 and 2019-2024 (11.5±3.9 to 24.6±15.4, p<0.002). Similar significant trends were observed for other terms, including “why can’t I burp” (4.3±4.8 to 17.6±4.8, p<0.002), “can’t burp” (5.9±1.2 to 9.3±1.6, p<0.002), “need to burp” (35.7±10.0 to 61.7±9.9, p<0.002), and “no burp” (10.9±4.0 to 18.4±5.9, p<0.002). Across all terms, top metropolitan areas showed consistently higher search volumes compared to top regions. CONCLUSIONS The significant increase in queries related to R-CPD likely reflects an increased awareness and interest in R-CPD throughout the United States. Relatively higher search volumes in metropolitan areas may reflect increased awareness, or even prevalence, of this condition in that setting. CLINICALTRIAL
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiwana et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: