This study demonstrates a dual-exponential model that improves residual oil evaluation in heavy oil reservoirs, indicating enhanced recovery potential.
The Threshold Pressure Gradient (TPG) phenomenon exerts a profound influence on fluid flow dynamics in heavy oil reservoirs. However, the discrepancies between the True Threshold Pressure Gradient (TTPG) and Pseudo-Threshold Pressure Gradient (PTPG) significantly impede accurate residual oil evaluation and rational field development planning. This study proposes a dual-exponential conversion model that effectively bridges the discrepancy between TTPG and PTPG, achieving an average deviation of 12.77–17.89% between calculated and measured TTPG values. Nonlinear seepage simulations demonstrate that TTPG induces distinct flow barrier effects, driving residual oil accumulation within low-permeability interlayers and the formation of well-defined “dead oil zones.” In contrast, the linear approximation inherent in PTPG overestimates flow initiation resistance, resulting in a 47% reduction in recovery efficiency and widespread residual oil enrichment. By developing a TTPG–PTPG conversion model and incorporating genuine nonlinear seepage characteristics into simulations, this study effectively mitigates the systematic errors arising from the linear PTPG assumption, thereby providing a scientific basis for accurately predicting residual oil distribution and enhancing oil recovery efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ke et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: