Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025

The comparison of cosmetic results of Karydakis and Limberg flap Techniques in pilonidal sinus

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ÜSÜmit SekmenAKA.H. KarayagizMPMelih Paksoy

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Observational analysis reveals superior cosmetic results with Karydakis technique in 100 patients, indicating a potential preference over Limberg flap.

Key Points

  • Karydakis technique demonstrates better cosmetic results in terms of SBSES scores compared to Limberg technique, enhancing patient satisfaction.
  • The comparison study involved 100 patients undergoing flap techniques, revealing no significant differences in demographic features.
  • Assessment utilized the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) to evaluate postoperative cosmetic outcomes effectively.
  • Surgical choices may be influenced by the observed cosmetic advantages of Karydakis over Limberg technique in pilonidal sinus repair.

Cite This Study

Sekmen et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1a41654b1d3bfb60ded5bhttps://doi.org/10.64512/jtmi.2025.6
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Surgical Management of Pilonidal Sinus: A Comparative Study of Excision, Limberg Flap, and Keystone Flap Reconstruction2026
  2. 2Comparing keystone and Limberg flaps for pilonidal sinus: Does flap choice influence patient satisfaction?2026
  3. 3‘’Comparative outcome study between simple closure and flap technique in Pilonidal sinus disease’’2024
  4. 4Surgical Intervention and Outcome of Patients with Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease2026
  5. 5Primary Closure vs Limberg Flap for Pilonidal Sinus-Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review2024