This case study improves the PSILCA database approach for end-of-life electric vehicles, highlighting key methodological issues.
Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) is rapidly evolving to complement sustainability assessment beyond environmental impact. This study focuses on improving the Product Social Impact Life Cycle Assessment (PSILCA) database approach through a case study on end-of-life electric vehicle policies in Japan. We show that the social risks associated with acquiring recycled battery materials are lower compared to importing virgin materials, thereby supporting the regulation on electric vehicle battery recycling. The social risks increase when recycling occurs in less developed countries such as Pakistan. Additionally, we point out critical methodological issues when using the PSILCA database. The built-in method weights non-worker stakeholders based on worker hours, and underestimates unavailable inventory data, and inconsistently groups social indicators. We address the issues by proposing a screening method for key supply chain activities and removing inapplicable indicators. The results become more accurate and easier to interpret. Overall, the method guides future S-LCA studies with an improved PSILCA database approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teah et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: