Analysis connects psychopathological traits to recidivism risk in former inmates, suggesting intervention strategies.
This study explores the relationship between psychopathological traits and criminal behavior in a sample of 54 former male inmates living in a Portuguese reintegration community between 2020 and 2023. Using data from the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) and the Mini-Mult, alongside structured clinical risk and protective factors assessments (HCR-20 and SAPROF), we examined associations between psychological profiles, crime type (violent vs. non-violent), and reintegration outcomes. Descriptive and inferential analyses revealed distinct psychopathological profiles across violent and non-violent offenders, T-test results indicated significantly higher scores in the Antisocial and Narcissistic scales among individuals who committed violent crimes. While the Mini-Mult revealed some positive trends, the MCMI-IV demonstrated greater sensitivity in differentiating clinical profiles, related to violence and risk. Furthermore, individuals with greater psychopathological severity exhibited significantly higher HCR-20 scores (p = .006), indicating elevated risk of recidivism, while no significant association was found with protective factors (SAPROF). Psychological intervention duration was also predictive of positive outcomes: inmates who received therapy for more than one year were 3.4 times more likely to successfully reintegrate. Conversely, employment status and family support showed no statistically significant impact on reintegration. These findings underscore the relevance of clinical assessment tools for risk evaluation and highlight the importance of sustained psychological interventions in the rehabilitation process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abrantes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: