Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025Journal of Industrial EcologyOpen Access

Stand‐alone power‐to‐X production dynamics: A multi‐method approach to quantify the emission‐cost reduction trade‐off

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ULUwe LangenmayrPHPaul HeinzmannASAlexander Schneider

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

This analysis combines techno-economic, life cycle, and optimization methods to evaluate production costs and greenhouse gas emissions in power-to-x processes.

Key Points

  • Locations with high wind capacity factors achieve the lowest costs and greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Locations with high solar PV capacity factors perform worst in terms of greenhouse gas emissions due to solar module production.
  • A mixed capacity factor approach enables cost-efficient greenhouse gas emissions reduction.
  • Flexible power-to-x technologies can significantly decrease costs and greenhouse gas emissions.

Cite This Study

Langenmayr et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1a5f254b1d3bfb60df9b9https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.70085
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Future hydrogen economies imply environmental trade-offs and a supply-demand mismatch2024 · 192 citations
  2. 2Large-scale hydrogen production <i>via</i> water electrolysis: a techno-economic and environmental assessment2022 · 662 citations
  3. 3Methanol as a renewable energy carrier: An assessment of production and transportation costs for selected global locations2021 · 253 citations
  4. 4Electrofuel Synthesis from Variable Renewable Electricity: An Optimization-Based Techno-Economic Analysis2021 · 44 citations