Great power rivalry between China and US has focused on the Asia-Pacific area because of its dynamic geopolitical and economic environment. In light of best-known theories liberalism, constructivism and realism, this article examines role of middle powers, either they act as agents of stability or pawns in great power rivalry? The role of middle powers is examined by using a descriptive method. An overview of recent developments in Asia-Pacific in light of security, trade and diplomacy is analysed with illustrating case studies of middle power Quad countries Australia, Japan and India; and non-Quad countries Vietnam, Indonesia and South Korea. The findings show that middle powers are managing dynamics of great power rivalry and they successfully serve as stabilising agents in region. We assert that their policies are shaped by external pressures from great powers, however; middle powers often work to maintain regional stability through multilateral and regional partnerships. A platform Asia-Pacific Union (APU) based on region issues that would be free from influence of greater powers is recommend to achieve regional stability. However, a study to analyze the potential capabilities of middle powers as passive or active mediator for achieving issued based multidomain cooperation is also suggested.
Iqbal et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: