Analysis reveals how language constructs power and manipulation in House of Cards, indicating Frank Underwood's dominance.
This research explores the language of conspiracy in House of Cards through a corpus-stylistic approach, applying the transitivity model of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) to analyze the monologues of Frank Underwood. The study examines the participants, processes, and circumstances within the monologues, focusing on how language constructs power, manipulation, and control in the context of political conspiracy. By breaking down Frank's monologues into mental, material, and relational processes, the analysis uncovers the linguistic strategies he employs to manipulate others, assert dominance, and navigate the political landscape. The findings reveal that material processes dominate Frank’s speech, reflecting his action-oriented and manipulative nature. His speech consistently positions him as the central agent of control, taking decisive actions to manipulate and shape political events around him. Mental processes, though present, are secondary and primarily serve to reflect Frank’s strategic thinking, while relational processes highlight his calculated evaluations of people and relationships, defining their value based on his political objectives. These linguistic features illustrate how Frank constructs power dynamics and manipulates those around him, solidifying his role as the mastermind behind the political conspiracy. Through this corpus-stylistic lens, the research highlights how language in House of Cards constructs a web of conspiracy, with Frank’s speech as the central force driving manipulation and power. This approach contributes to a deeper understanding of how linguistic choices shape the narrative of conspiracy and power in political dramas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rese. Muayad Tahseen Yousif (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: