Observational analysis finds BAX rs4645878 variant linked to increased PTC risk in females, suggesting genetic markers for susceptibility.
Background Pro-apoptotic BAX protein plays a crucial role in mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis regulation. Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in the BAX gene may serve as genetic risk markers for predicting the occurrence of cancer susceptibility and defining high-risk individuals. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of the BAX rs4645878 variant with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) risk in a group of Egyptian patients. Methods The study was conducted on 50 PTC patients, 50 patients with non-malignant thyroid disease and 50 healthy individuals as controls. The genotyping of the BAX rs4645878 variant was carried out using the TaqMan Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay. Results The BAX rs4645878 variant analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the frequency of genotypes and alleles between all studied groups ( P > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in neck ultrasound TIRADS score between the PTC and non-malignant thyroid disease groups ( P < 0.001). However, we found a non-significant association between TIRADS score and BAX rs4645878 variant ( P > 0.05). The study revealed a significant association between genotypes of the BAX rs4645878 variant and PTC risk in female patients ( P = 0.044), but not in males ( P > 0.05). Compared with the combined genotypes (A/G + A/A), the G/G genotype was associated with an elevated risk of PTC among females (OR = 6.2, 95% CI = 1.2–31.3). Similarly, the G allele was associated with 6.9 times more risk of having PTC in females compared with the A allele (OR = 6.9, 95% CI = 1.5–32.3, P = 0.022). Conclusion The G/G genotype and G allele of the BAX rs4645878 variant can serve as genetic risk markers for PTC susceptibility among females.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tolba et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: