Online experiment reveals moral outrage impacts crisis communication effectiveness with AI sources, highlighting authenticity's role.
This study aims to advance crisis communication by incorporating morality in understanding crisis communication and explicating effective strategies for using artificial intelligence (AI) technology (e.g., ChatGPT) in the context of the ‘preventable’ cluster of crisis types. To this end, we conducted an online experiment, adopting a 3 (crisis type) × 2 (crisis response source label) between‐subjects design. The results indicate that scansis elicited greater moral outrage than other crisis types and that a crisis response from ChatGPT led to lower authenticity than a crisis response from a PR representative. Indirect effects analyses demonstrated that moral outrage, authenticity and forgiveness mediated the effects of crisis type and message source label on behavioural outcomes. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: