Hybrid approach uncovers gaps in shariah governance literature, highlighting compliance and audit themes.
The study aims to explore Shariah governance literature by deploying a hybrid approach that fuses structured literature review with bibliometric analysis. The hybrid approach highlights emerging trends, influential aspects, most occurring keywords, intellectual clusters, emerging themes, and avenues for future research. Existing literature features limited coverage and overlooks some essential dimensions of Shariah governance. We bridge these gaps through two contributions: (1) we underscore previously overlooked, yet important themes like Shariah audit, compliance, and reporting; and (2) we do not impose any restrictions for time or region in our sample. Additionally, we also expand the coverage of literature by considering studies from Web of Science (WoS) core collection in the review, a source mostly ignored in review studies covering Shariah governance. The analysis shows that literature prefers the quantitative approach over qualitative one. The essential dimensions like Shariah audit, compliance, and reporting are marginally covered in the Shariah governance research. Further, the dominant themes include examining the impact of various aspects of governance on performance and risk management of firms, and comparison of the governance practices of Islamic and conventional institutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siddiqui et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: