Legal implications of not extending building use rights on state-owned land

This study discusses the legal implications arising from the failure to extend the Right to Build (HGB) on state-owned land using a literature review method. The failure to extend the HGB results in the land reverting to state ownership and severing the legal relationship between the HGB holder and the land. This situation directly impacts legal certainty and protection of ownership rights over buildings constructed on the land. Buildings standing on state-owned land without a valid legal basis become vulnerable to expropriation, demolition, or other administrative actions by the government. This study emphasizes the importance of awareness and administrative compliance among HGB holders to renew their rights to ensure legal certainty, asset protection, and prevent economic losses. This study is expected to serve as a reference for building owners, the government, and policymakers in understanding and anticipating the legal consequences that may arise.