Assessment reveals that Ni-Ga alloy phases modulate methanol activity in hydrogenation of CO2, suggesting new pathways for catalyst design.
In this work, we assess how the structure of SiO2-supported, Ni-Ga alloys determines their activity and selectivity for the hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol. Using a hydrothermal deposition-precipitation approach followed by activation at 700 °C in H2, we synthesize catalysts containing α-Ni, α-Ni9Ga, α'-Ni3Ga, or δ-Ni5Ga3 phases supported on amorphous SiO2. Operando X-ray pair distribution function analysis and X-ray absorption spectroscopy confirm unequivocally the structure of all phases and their stability under reaction conditions; additionally, all catalysts contain GaO x species in varying amounts. We observe that the catalysts α'-Ni3Ga/SiO2 and δ-Ni5Ga3/SiO2 exhibit high methanol formation rates (∼0.8 mmolMeOH molNi -1 s-1), which are 27 times greater than those of α-Ni9Ga/SiO2 and α-Ni/SiO2. Notably, α'-Ni3Ga/SiO2 shows the highest selectivity for methanol at 71%, compared to 55% for δ-Ni5Ga3/SiO2 and 11% for α-Ni9Ga/SiO2, which challenges the conventional view of α'-Ni3Ga being a poor catalyst for methanol synthesis. To explain the high methanol selectivity and productivity of α'-Ni3Ga/SiO2 compared to the other alloy phases, DFT calculations were performed. It was found that the Ni-rich step sites in α'-Ni3Ga effectively stabilize key reaction intermediates (HCOO* and CH3O*) for the formation of methanol. However, such Ni-rich step sites in α'-Ni3Ga also favor CO* dissociation, which could facilitate methane formation, yet the presence of GaO x decreases the stability of CO* on α'-Ni3Ga, explaining ultimately the promotion of HCOO* formation. This study highlights the importance of Ga species (both metallic and oxidic) in modulating the electronic properties of heterogeneous catalysts, providing a versatile toolbox to stabilize key reaction intermediates, leading ultimately to high product selectivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zimmerli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: