Analysis reveals the impact of far-right memes on online communities, suggesting a complex interplay between humor and serious politics.
This paper draws on previous scholarship on humor, memes, and seriousness in International Relations to produce a novel means for understanding online far-right communities. In this paper, I challenge the distinction between silly and serious and argue for a space that recognizes the simultaneous existence of these concepts when it comes to researching far-right memes. The paper is explicit in arguing that we pay attention to far-right memes, but do not take them “too seriously” because far-right groups often take the opportunity to ridicule mainstream and leftist moral panics around memes. Simultaneously, far-right politics have the potential for serious harm, so these communities cannot be seen as exclusively silly. Through an analysis of the seemingly silly memes manufactured by the far-right Nordic Resistance Movement, I argue for understanding memes as central to home-building efforts by online far-right communities. These online spaces are technically accessible but conceptually inaccessible; significant prior knowledge is required to be part of online humorous far-right communities, and I argue this serves a bordering function. Moreover, without an appreciation for the silly/serious nature of far-right memes and politics and the homes they provide, we will never truly grasp the appeal of engaging with such communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charlie W. Price (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: