Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized controlled trial found SOLIUS UVB exposure significantly improves 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, suggesting it is a safe alternative for supplementation.
Vitamin D deficiency is a prevalent global health issue, particularly in regions with limited sunlight exposure. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the SOLIUS system in improving serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations in individuals with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency, and to assess its safety profile. This study was conducted with 69 participants, divided into treatment and control groups. The treatment group received ultraviolet B (UVB) exposure from the SOLIUS system, while the control group received sham exposure with blue/purple light. The study included a 5-week titration phase to determine individual UVB sensitivity, followed by a 16-week intervention phase. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were measured at baseline and at multiple time points using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. The treatment group showed a significant increase in serum 25(OH)D concentrations, with an average increase of 10.2 ng/ml from week 1 to week 21 (p<0.01), compared to a decrease of 2.3 ng/ml in the control group. Significant predictors of 25(OH)D concentration changes included UV exposure (p<0.01) and baseline 25(OH)D concentrations (p=0.01). The SOLIUS system was well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported, although 52% of participants experienced minor adverse events such as redness and itchiness. The SOLIUS system effectively increased 25(OH)D concentrations in individuals with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency, offering a safe solution for improving vitamin D status. These findings have significant implications for public health, particularly for individuals with limited sun exposure or malabsorption issues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shirvani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: