Experimental analysis reveals a new geothermometer equation for predicting temperature in magmatic processes, suggesting its application may be limited in certain rock types.
We present new experimental data on ZrO2 and HfO2 concentration in aluminosilicate melts of wide compositional range (M = (Na + K + 2Ca)/(Al·Si), cation ratio, from 0.66 to 2.77) equilibrated, respectively, with zircon (Zrn) or hafnon (Hfn) at temperature 900–1473°C. The experiments indicate nearly identical dependence of Zrn and Hfn solubility on the melt composition. A geothermometer equation: T (±36) = 2449/(lnKd + 1.704), where Kd = (Zr/Hf)Zrn/(Zr/Hf)m is the Zr and Hf distribution coefficient between Zrn and melt (m), symbols of elements denote their concentration (in ppm) in zircon and melt, and T is temperature in K, is derived by thermodynamic processing of the experimental data. In calculations with this equation, we accepted constant Zr concentration in Zrn of 490 000 ppm. The commonly observed increase in Hf concentration from the cores to margins of magmatic zircon crystals may be related to fractional crystallization of zircon. For differentiated magmatic series, the initial crystallization temperature of zircon in the least silicic varieties should be evaluated using the cores of zircon grains with the highest Zr/Hf ratio. Application of the geothermometer for mafic and intermediate rocks may be hampered due to simultaneous crystallization of Zrn with other ore and/or mafic minerals relatively enriched in Zr and Hf. The newly derived geothermometer has some advantages over other indicators of the crystallization temperature of magmatic zircon based on the zircon saturation and on the Ti concentration in this mineral, as it does not depend on the major-oxide melt composition and on the accuracy of the estimated SiO2 and TiO2 activities in the melts. Calculations of the Zr and Hf fractionation trends in the course of zircon crystallization in granitoid melts allows evaluating the temperature at which more evolved melt portions were segregated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aranovich et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: