This framework improves feeding intensity recognition by integrating audio-visual data, suggesting enhanced monitoring in aquaculture.
Accurate evaluation of fish feeding intensity is crucial for optimizing aquaculture efficiency and the healthy growth of fish. Previous methods mainly rely on single-modal approaches (e.g., audio or visual). However, the complex underwater environment makes single-modal monitoring methods face significant challenges: visual systems are severely affected by water turbidity, lighting conditions, and fish occlusion, while acoustic systems suffer from background noise. Although existing studies have attempted to combine acoustic and visual information, most adopt simple feature-level fusion strategies, which fail to fully explore the complementary advantages of the two modalities under different environmental conditions and lack dynamic evaluation mechanisms for modal reliability. To address these problems, we propose the Adaptive Cross-modal Attention Fusion Network (ACAF-Net), a cross-modal complementarity learning framework with a two-stage attention fusion mechanism: (1) a cross-modal enhancement stage that enriches individual representations through Low-rank Bilinear Pooling and learnable fusion weights; (2) an adaptive attention fusion stage that dynamically weights acoustic and visual features based on complementarity and environmental reliability. Our framework incorporates dimension alignment strategies and attention mechanisms to capture temporal–spatial complementarity between acoustic feeding signals and visual behavioral patterns. Extensive experiments demonstrate superior performance compared to single-modal and conventional fusion approaches, with 6.4% accuracy improvement. The results validate the effectiveness of exploiting cross-modal complementarity for underwater behavioral analysis and establish a foundation for intelligent aquaculture monitoring systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: