What type of study is this?

September 10, 2025Indus journal of bioscience research.Open Access

Diagnostic Accuracy of AIMS65 and Glasgow-Blatchford Score in Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Cirrhosis Presenting with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

MAMuhammad Nauman AhmadThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar MIMuhammad IjazBacha Khan University SSSamina SaeedShaikh Zayed Hospital

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Cross-sectional analysis compares diagnostic accuracy of AIMS65 and Glasgow-Blatchford Score in cirrhosis patients, highlighting implications for risk stratification.

Key Points

GBS showed superior sensitivity and negative predictive value in predicting mortality in cirrhotic patients.
In-hospital mortality occurred in 12.6% of participants, with 70.5% requiring blood transfusions.
A cross-sectional study conducted over six months included 190 cirrhotic patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Results suggest that both AIMS65 and GBS scores are valuable but require cautious interpretation in complex cirrhosis cases.

Cite This Study

Ahmad et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1a90554b1d3bfb60e2057 https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1893

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Cross-sectional analysis compares diagnostic accuracy of AIMS65 and Glasgow-Blatchford Score in cirrhosis patients, highlighting implications for risk stratification.

Diagnostic Accuracy of AIMS65 and Glasgow-Blatchford Score in Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Cirrhosis Presenting with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Diagnostic Accuracy of AIMS65 and Glasgow-Blatchford Score in Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Cirrhosis Presenting with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider