Observational study finds low appetite linked to worse discharge outcomes in older patients, suggesting healthcare interventions are needed.
Objective This study aimed to investigate the association between nutritional appetite status—assessed during a standardized eight-week hospitalization period using the Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ)—and discharge outcomes at a one-year follow-up in older hospitalized patients with multiple comorbidities. Methods A prospective one-year observational study was conducted in a convalescent geriatric hospital. This study was conducted with 77 patients aged 65 and older with comorbidities who have been on oral intake for more than 8 weeks after hospitalization. Patients were divided into low ( n = 40) and normal ( n = 37) appetite groups based on a SNAQ score cut-off of 14. Odds ratio (OR) analysis was conducted to compare improved and deteriorated discharge outcomes at the one-year mark according to appetite status, adjusted for Charlson comorbidity index, activities of daily living score, and nutritional intake. Results The low appetite group had significantly lower energy (1215.68 ± 68.96 kcal vs. 1495.50 ± 48.03 kcal, P = 0.001) and protein intake (55.66 ± 2.83 g vs. 65.75 ± 1.88 g, P = 0.004). They reported poorer appetite, felt full with fewer mouthfuls, worse food taste, and fewer meals daily ( P < 0.05). Adjusted for Charlson comorbidity index, Activities of daily living score, and nutritional intake, the low appetite group had a higher risk of adverse discharge outcomes, such as death or intensive care, with an adjusted OR of 8.524 (95% CI: 1.331–59.739, P = 0.024). Their likelihood of improvement, defined as discharge to a nursing home or home, was reduced, with an adjusted OR of 0.109 (95% CI: 0.013–0.915, P = 0.041). Conclusions This study underscores the clinical importance of assessing and promoting appetite to improve discharge outcomes and reduce healthcare costs for long-term hospitalized geriatric patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: