This study demonstrates the effectiveness of management zone delineation in rainfed systems and irrigated fields, indicating optimal production strategies.
This study investigates the delineation of management zones (MZs) to support site-specific crop management by simplifying within-field variability in irrigated (54.6 ha) and rainfed (7.9 ha) sorghum and soybean fields in Brazil. Historical yield, apparent soil electrical conductivity (ECa) at 0.75 m and 1.50 m, and terrain data were analyzed using multivariate statistics to define MZs. Two clustering methods—fuzzy c-means (FCM) and hierarchical clustering—were compared for variance reduction effectiveness. Rainfed areas showed greater spatial variability (yield CV 9–12%; ECa CV 20–27%) than irrigated fields (yield CV < 7%; ECa CV ~5%). Principal component analysis (PCA) identified subsoil ECa and elevation as key variables in irrigated fields, while surface ECa and topography influenced rainfed variability. FCM produced more homogeneous zones with fewer classes, especially in irrigated fields, whereas hierarchical clustering better detected outliers but required more zones for similar variance reduction. Yield correlated strongly with slope and moisture in rainfed systems. These results emphasize aligning MZ delineation with production system characteristics—enabling variable rate irrigation in irrigated fields and promoting moisture conservation in rainfed systems. FCM is recommended for operational efficiency, while hierarchical clustering offers higher precision in complex contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sterle et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: