In vitro analysis shows sulforaphane improves platelet function in high glucose conditions, highlighting its protective effects against thrombosis.
Background Platelet abnormalities are well-recognized complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). High glucose (HG) increases platelet mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis and hyperreactivity in T2DM, which underlie the occurrence of thrombotic events. Sulforaphane (SFN) is a dietary isothiocyanate enriched in cruciferous vegetables and possesses multiple biological activities. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of SFN on platelet dysfunction in HG-stimulated human platelets in vitro . Methods Washed human platelets from healthy donors were pre-incubated with SFN (5, 10, or 20 μM) or vehicle control (0.05% DMSO) for 40 min at 37°C, with or without pharmacologic inhibitors (apalrestat, PP2, N-acetyl-cysteine, pifithrin-μ). Platelets were then stimulated with normal glucose (NG, 5 mM) or HG (25 mM) for an additional 90 min. Functional assays were performed to evaluate SFN efficacy and investigate its underlying mechanisms. Results The results demonstrated that SFN attenuated HG-induced platelet dysfunction by alleviating mitochondrial dysfunction (manifested as loss of mitochondrial membrane potential; p < 0.001), apoptosis (characterized by increased caspase-9/-3 activation and phosphatidylserine exposure; p < 0.01), and hyperreactivity (evidenced by enhanced aggregation and activation; p < 0.05). Mechanistically, SFN significantly suppressed HG-induced aldose reductase (AR) activity ( p < 0.001). Pharmacological inhibition revealed that the beneficial effects of SFN on platelet function were mediated mechanistically through AR downregulation, which attenuated p53 phosphorylation via Src-dependent ROS generation. Conclusion These findings suggest that by inhibiting the Src/ROS/p53 signaling pathway and mitigating AR-mediated platelet dysfunction, SFN may confer significant protection against atherothrombosis during hyperglycemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: