Cross-sectional assessment of glycated albumin as a diabetes glycaemic marker in Nigeria, showing significant correlations and diagnostic potential.
Background: Glycated Albumin (GA) has emerged as an alternative glycaemic marker that is gaining attention globally. It provides a measure of short-to-medium term glycaemia (2-4 weeks) and is independent of red blood cell related disorders; in comparison to glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) which is widely used for monitoring glycaemic control. In Nigeria where anaemia and haemoglobinopathies are prevalent, GA could serve as a more reliable and cost-effective index of glycaemic control, and more so in resource-contrained settings. Objective: This study assessed serum GA concentration in 100 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and 120 healthy controls, and compared it with traditional glycaemic markers i.e HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study carried out among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients accessing care at a tertiary hospital in North-central Nigeria between November 2020 and October 2021. Serum GA was estimated using an Enzymatic method, while FPG and HbA1c estimation was by Hexokinase and TINIA methods respectively. Results: The study participants were 36% males, mean age of T2DM patients and control group was 57±10yrs and 48±10yrs respectively. GA showed a significant strong positive correlation with HbA1c in T2DM patients and a positive but weak correlation among the control group (rho = 0.785, p-value <0.001 and rho = 0.183, p-value = 0.069, respectively). GA also showed good diagnostic performance when compared to FPG and HbA1c with AUC of 0.762 (p<0.001) and 0.845 (p<0.001) respectively. Conclusion: GA as a glycaemic marker from the findings of this study is useful as a complimentary marker for monitoring and possible diagnostic tool for diabetes mellitus in the Nigerian setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: