Mixed-method analysis reveals self-efficacy impacts physical activity in college athletes, suggesting a new framework for management and training.
This study explores the relationship between self-efficacy and physical activity levels among college athletes and proposes a development framework for improving their management and training. Employing a mixed- method approach, the research used standardized questionnaires – the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) – to quantitatively assess self-efficacy and physical activity among college athletes at Hunan Institute of Technology. Results indicate that athletes' self-efficacy is at a moderate level with room for improvement, while their physical activity levels are relatively high. The study found significant gender and grade differences in self-efficacy and physical activity levels, and a positive correlation between self-efficacy and physical activity intensity. Through qualitative interviews with professional teachers, the research identifies various influencing factors on athletes’ self-efficacy from the perspectives of schools, teachers, and athletes themselves. School-related factors include discipline settings, teaching staff, policies, and management systems; teacher-related factors include professional quality and communication skills; athlete-related factors include personal experiences and psychological influences. Based on these findings, a comprehensive framework is developed to enhance self-efficacy by improving school management, teacher capabilities, and athletes’ self-regulation and mutual support. This study contributes a new perspective to educational and sports psychology by linking self-efficacy theory with practical management strategies to promote the physical and mental development of college athletes and improve their competitive performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu Yinfu (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: