Our approach integrates deep learning models and enhanced MSAs, achieving top rankings in protein complex and RNA predictions.
We present the methods and results of our protein complex and RNA structure predictions at CASP16. Our approach integrated multiple state-of-the-art deep learning models with a consensus-based scoring method. To enhance the depth of multiple sequence alignments (MSAs), we employed a large metagenomic sequence database. Model ranking was performed with a state-of-the-art consensus ranking method, to which we added more scoring terms. These predictions were further refined manually based on literature evidence. For RNA, we adopted an ensemble approach that incorporated multiple state-of-the-art methods, centered around our NuFold framework. As a result, our KiharaLab group ranked first in protein complex prediction and third in RNA structure prediction. A detailed analysis of targets that significantly differed from those of other groups highlighted both the strengths of our MSA and scoring strategies, as well as areas requiring further improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kagaya et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: