Prospective study enhances scan efficiency using various injection regimens and dynamic scans.
The study aims to maximize clinical scan efficiency for Total-body (TB) 18F-FDG PET/CT systems by optimizing scan strategies based on theoretical models and clinical experience from a single center. This prospective study include two parts. The first part involved simulation experiments using theoretical models to maximize patient throughput and/or minimizing radiotracer activity across four clinical scanning scenarios: fixed working time, predetermined radiotracer activity, integration of various injection activity regimens for a fixed number of patients, and incorporation of dynamic scans into routine static scans within a fixed working time. The optimal scan strategies for these scenarios were then proposed. The second part validated the estimated throughput results through high-throughput tests performed in the real clinical settings with an fixed working time of 8 h. Under a fixed working time of 8 h, the theoretical patient throughput for full-activity, half-activity, 1/3-activity, and 1/10-activity injection regimens was 60, 48, 43, 30 patients, respectively. The corresponding real clinical throughput achieved was 60, 49, 48, 28 patients. For a total 18F-FDG activity of 37,000 to 148,000 MBq (1 to 4 Ci), the 1/3-activity injection regimen yielded the highest patient throughput, ranging 52 to 72 patients. Strategically combining various injection activity regimens could reduce radiotracer activity consumption. Additionally, placing full-activity dynamic scans after routine static scans for full-activity, half-activity, and 1/3-activity, and before 1/10 activity, proved to ba more economical strategies. Optimized scan strategies for typical clinical scenarios of TB 18F-FDG PET/CT systems were proposed, which could promote clinical scan efficiency and accommodate diverse clinical requirements. These strategies enable centers to balance throughput and activity efficiency while maintaining diagnostic quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: