Mixed-methods research identifies key predictors of preparedness in communities facing volcanic eruptions, suggesting multi-channel strategies.
This study investigates the determinants of community preparedness for volcanic eruptions in Batangas using an integrated Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) framework. Employing a mixed-methods design, the research combined a structured survey and focus group discussions to assess the roles of hazard knowledge, media reliance, risk perception, subjective norm, attitude, and perceived behavioral control among residents, barangay officials, and disaster risk reduction officers. Stratified sampling ensured representation across high-risk and vulnerable groups. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, SEM, and thematic analysis. Results revealed that subjective norm (β = 0.59), perceived risk proximity (β = 0.63), and media reliance (β = 0.57) were the strongest predictors of preparedness, while hazard knowledge alone was insufficient to drive action without supportive community structures and resources. Notably, preparedness levels were higher among residents with strong social networks and frequent engagement with official risk communication channels. However, gaps in resource access and persistent misinformation on social media hindered effective preparedness, particularly among marginalized groups. The study proposes a multi-channel, community-driven disaster risk reduction framework and the development of the "Bantay Bulkan Para sa Mamamayan" toolkit to enhance capacity-building, information verification, and inclusive preparedness strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Labrador et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: