This study compares the bioavailability of anastrozole between transdermal nano-spanlastics and oral suspension in albino rabbits, highlighting significant efficacy differences.
Background: Anastrozole is a cornerstone in the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Oral administration presents several challenges that can impact therapeutic efficacy and patient adherence. The adverse effects can potentially compromise treatment outcomes. Objective: To compare the bioavailability of Anastrozole as a transdermal ANS-nano-spanlastics (SPLs) patch with oral ANS-suspension. Methods: This study involved 12 female albino rabbits, weighing 2 kg, which were randomly divided into two groups of six animals each. Group I received a dose of 0.104 mg of pure anastrozole suspension orally, while Group II was administered anastrozole as transdermal nano-Spanlastic patches. Plasma anastrozole concentrations were quantified using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC). Results: The results demonstrated significant differences between the oral and transdermal delivery of Anastrozole. For the oral suspension, the maximum plasma concentration was 38 ng/mL, achieved at 1.5 hours, with an AUC of 368 ng · h/mL. The nano-spanlastic patch produced a lower Cmax (24.2 ng/ml) at a delayed Tmax (24 hours) and a significantly greater AUC (10714.58 ng·h/ml). The relative bioavailability of the transdermal formulation was 29 times higher than that of the oral route after 120 hr. Conclusions: The nanospanlastic transdermal patch offers a more efficient and sustained method of anastrozole delivery compared to conventional oral suspension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alwan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: