This analysis demonstrates that sequential and alternating hydraulic fracture strategies enhance fracture effectiveness, implying improved oil recovery.
Horizontal well fracturing is vital for low-permeability tight oil reservoirs, but multi-fracture effectiveness is hampered by stress shadowing and fluid-rock interactions, particuarly in optimizing fracture geometry and conductivity under different sequencing strategies. While previous studies have addressed aspects of pore pressure and stress effects, a comprehensive comparison of sequencing strategies using fully coupled models capturing the intricate seepage–stress–damage interactions remains limited. This study employs a novel 2D fully coupled XFEM model to quantitatively evaluate three fracturing approaches: simultaneous, sequential, and alternating. Numerical results demonstrate that sequential and alternating strategies alleviate stress interference, increasing cumulative fracture length by 20.6% and 26.1%, respectively, versus conventional simultaneous fracturing. Based on the research findings, fracture width reductions are 30.44% (simultaneous), 18.78% (sequential), and 7.21% (alternating). As fracture width directly governs conductivity—the critical parameter determining hydrocarbon flow efficiency—the alternating strategy’s superior width preservation (92.79% retention) enables optimal conductivity design. These findings provide critical insights for designing fracture networks with targeted dimensions and conductivity in tight reservoirs and offer a practical basis to optimize fracture sequencing design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: