Pilot study assesses people-focused versus thing-focused thinking in engineering students, suggesting a shift is needed.
Engineers are often perceived as focusing more on the technical aspects of a product instead of on the users. Design methodologies such as human-centred design and co-design attempt to shift this focus from the artifact or device to the people who require the design. This study aims to develop a methodological approach to examine structured reflections to assess whether a student is people-focused or thing-focused. The weekly reflections of two summer students working on an accessibility project were categorized on a four-point scale and further analyzed based on the project phases. The results revealed that as the project progressed, there was a statistically significant shift in focus from people to things (p <.05). Individual differences were also observed, with one participant showing a stronger focus on client requirements while the other emphasized user needs. The findings suggest that engineering education could incorporate approaches promoting people-focus throughout the design process, particularly in later stages, to improve usability and technical feasibility. As this is a pilot study intended to develop a methodological approach, the small sample limits the generalizability of the findings, and future research will expand the sample size and validate an instrument.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Latheef et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: