PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Reconstructive Therapy in Patients with Peri-Implantitis in a University Dental Hospital: A Preliminary Retrospective Case Series Focusing on Complications

View Full Paper
AAAhmad AA AlahmariXCXavier Costa‐BerenguerRFRui Figueiredo

Key Points

  • More than half (52.4%) of patients experienced wound dehiscence after reconstructive surgery for peri-implantitis.
  • Significant associations were found between dehiscence and factors like mandibular location and poor hygiene.
  • Retrospective analysis of 14 patients revealed complications including membrane exposure and soft tissue issues.
  • Results indicate that complications may reduce the overall success in bone regeneration efforts for these patients.

Abstract

Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory disease-causing bone loss around dental implants, often requiring reconstructive surgical therapies to reduce probing depth and regenerate bone. However, such surgeries are frequently complicated by postoperative issues. This retrospective case series aimed to identify the main postoperative complications following the reconstructive treatment of peri-implant bone defects in peri-implantitis patients. Data from 14 patients with 21 affected implants were analyzed, including demographics, oral hygiene, surgical techniques, and complications such as wound dehiscence, membrane exposure, and infections. Wound dehiscence was measured using Image J® software version 1.54. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed. The results showed that 11 implants (52.4%; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 29% to 76%) in nine patients (57.1%; 95%CI = 27% to 87%) developed soft tissue dehiscence after one week, with membrane exposure observed in 4 implants. Dehiscence was significantly associated with mandibular implant location (p = 0.003), poor interproximal hygiene (p = 0.008), and membrane exposure (p = 0.034). No postoperative infections were recorded. In conclusion, more than half of peri-implantitis patients undergoing reconstructive surgery experience wound dehiscence, particularly in cases involving mandible, poor hygiene, and membrane exposure. This complication might compromise bone regeneration and reduce the treatment success rate. These results should be interpreted cautiously due to study design limitations (retrospective design, lack of a control group, and small sample size).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alahmari et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1abf954b1d3bfb60e429bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/app15148040
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessment of implant surface and instrument insert changes due to instrumentation with different tips for ultrasonic-driven debridement2021 · 21 citations
  2. 2Outcome of supportive peri-implant therapy on the rates of peri-implant diseases and marginal bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2021 · 18 citations
  3. 3Risk indicators for peri‐implant mucositis: a systematic literature review2014 · 163 citations
  4. 4Periimplant diseases: where are we now? – Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology2011 · 942 citations
  5. 5Dental Implants: The Last 100 Years2017 · 119 citations