Retrospective cohort study explores treatment outcomes for peri-implantitis in a specialized setting, indicating key factors affecting success.
Aim To explore the treatment outcome of surgical peri-implantitis protocols in a university-based setting.Materials And Methods Four-hundred and six implants in 223 patients were surgically treated by four trained surgeons using open-flap debridement (OFD, 37 implants), implantoplasty (Impl, 39 implants), reconstructive surgery (Rec, 241 implants) or a combined approach (Comb, 89 implants). Treatment success after 1 year (maximum probing depth (max PD) ≤ 5 mm, bleeding on probing (BOP) at ≤ 1 site and no suppuration) was the primary outcome. Logistic regression was used to explore associations between patient-/implant-related factors, treatment modalities and treatment success, implant loss and surgical retreatment.Results Treatment was successful in 54.7% of implants after 1 year: OFD 62.5%, Impl 58.3%, Rec 55.4%, Comb 48.3%, with no significant group differences. Over a mean follow-up of 30.80 ± 19.62 months, 40 implants (9.9%) were lost and 38 (9.4%) required surgical retreatment. In exploratory multivariable analyses, systemic antibiotic use (pre-operative: OR = 3.54, p = 0.04; pre- and post-operative: OR = 4.49, p = 0.02) and surgeon experience (OR = 0.12, p = 0.003) showed associations with treatment success. Molar site (OR = 3.21, p = 0.03), antibiotic (pre- and post-operative: OR = 3.13, p = 0.02) and baseline suppuration (OR = 4.51, p = 0.002) were associated with implant loss. Surgical retreatment was associated with overdenture (OR = 3.59, p = 0.003) and max PD at baseline (OR = 1.30, p = 0.001).Conclusions Surgical peri-implantitis outcome was associated with systemic antibiotic, surgeon, molar site, overdenture, baseline suppuration and PD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: