This analysis reveals how participatory governance and institutional innovation improve ecological outcomes in rural regions, suggesting a new approach to sustainability.
This study examines how Marxist ecological civilisation principles shape institutional and participatory approaches to rural environmental revitalisation in China, focusing on the regional cases of Zhejiang and Fujian. Both regions have faced severe ecological challenges threatening the well-being of their rural populations. In response, local governments have adopted strategies rooted in Marxist ecological citizenship, replacing environmentally exploitative private-sector practices with state-led initiatives prioritising ecological sustainability. These strategies have been characterised by institutional innovation and participatory governance, resulting in the implementation of effective environmental practices. While both regions have demonstrated policy success, Zhejiang’s approach stands out due to its integration of Confucian ethical values alongside Marxist principles. This hybrid model represents a distinctive non-Western paradigm of sustainability, combining community-based engagement with collective ownership to achieve enhanced ecological outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: