Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research introduces an enhanced aspect matching method for criteria-level explanations, suggesting improved engagement and satisfaction.
Background: The explainability of recommender systems (RSs) is currently attracting significant attention. Recent research mainly focus on item-level explanations, neglecting the need to provide comprehensive explanations for each criterion. In contrast, this research introduces a criteria-level explanation generated in a content-based pardigm by matching aspects between the user and item. However, generation may fall short when user aspects do not match perfectly with the item, despite possessing similar semantics. Objective: This research aims to extend the aspect-matching method by leveraging semantic similarity. The extension provides more detail and comprehensive explanations for recommendations at the criteria level. Methods: An extended version of the aspect matching (AM) method was used. This method identified identical aspects between users and items and obtained semantically similar aspects with closely related meanings. Results: Experiment results from two real-world datasets showed that AM+ was superior to the AM method in coverage and relevance. However, the improvement varied depending on the dataset and criteria sparsity. Conclusion: The proposed method improves the comprehensiveness and quality of the criteria-level explanation. Therefore, the adopted method has the potential to improve the explainability of multi-criteria RSs. The implication extends beyond the enhancement of explanation to facilitate better user engagement and satisfaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rismala et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: