Qualitative analysis shows social capital enhances bureaucratic governance in achieving independent villages.
The development of independent villages in South Konawe Regency can be realized in the implementation of bureaucratic reform in good governance. In this case, the government's target is a clean and accountable bureaucracy, an effective and efficient bureaucracy, and having quality public services. In the development process, the political, legal and technological realms can support regional development. However, the economic, social and physical environmental dimensions are still in process and have not supported the achievement of independent villages significantly. Social capital is present in the village community to support bureaucratic steps towards good governance. This study aims to determine the synergy of social capital and bureaucratic governance in realizing independent villages in South Konawe Regency. The research method used is qualitative with in-depth interview techniques, observation and documentation studies. Through information from 25 informants, the results of the study show that social capital is indicated by 3 indicators. First, trust shown in conflict resolution, community mutual cooperation, trust arising from village leadership, and trust based on mutual affection. Second, the network manifested in partnerships between social organizations and social groups. Third, norms that create participation, harmony and mutual respect, customary norms, and reciprocal norms. These three capitals are in synergy with bureaucratic steps that are sound governance, dynamic governance, and open government
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moita et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: