This research reveals the effects of chromium additives on hardness and toughness in boron carbide ceramics.
This study presents the results of spark plasma sintering of powders within the boron–carbon–chromium system, focusing on boron carbide (B 4 C), chromium carbide (Cr 3 C 2 ), and chromium diboride (CrB 2 ). The powders were synthesized using the original vacuum-free direct current arc reactor, where the starting powder mixture was exposed to an arc discharge for 60 s under a direct current of 200 A. Bulk samples based on B 4 C and CrB 2 were sintered under identical conditions, with a temperature of 1800 °C and a pressure of 60 MPa, while the sintering of Cr 3 C 2 -based ceramics was conducted at 1300 °C and 30 MPa. In some cases, sintering additives – 25 wt. % Cr 3 C 2 and 20 wt. % CrB 2 – were introduced during the sintering of B 4 C-based bulk samples. The phase composition of the sintered samples was analyzed using X -ray diffraction (XRD), while the microstructure and elemental composition were examined via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The hardness of the sintered ceramics was measured using a Vickers indenter under a load of 1 kg, revealing hardness values of 22.7 ± 1.8 GPa for B 4 C, 12.6 ± 0.3 GPa for CrB 2 , and 11.4 ± 0.1 GPa for Cr 3 C 2 . The introduction of 25 wt. % Cr 3 C 2 as a sintering additive in B 4 C-based ceramics reduced the hardness to 17.7 ± 5.6 GPa; however, it significantly improved the fracture toughness, increasing it from 2.5 ± 0.2 to 3.3 ± 0.3 MPa·m 1/2 . Conversely, the addition of 20 wt. % CrB 2 during B 4 C sintering led to an increase in the bulk sample’s hardness from 22.7 ± 1.8 GPa to 26.8 ± 1.3 GPa.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vassilyeva et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: