Prospective cohort study demonstrates significant improvements in chronic rhinosinusitis outcomes, indicating effectiveness of FESS.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of full-house revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) in patients with recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) who had previously undergone sinus surgeries. Methods: This prospective study was carried out at the Otorhinolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery Center in Sulaymaniyah Teaching Hospital and Zhian Private Hospital between January 2019 and March 2020. A total of 21 patients with recurrent CRS, each having undergone at least one previous sinus surgery, were enrolled to undergo revision full-house FESS. The effectiveness of the surgery was assessed using both subjective and objective outcome measures. Subjective evaluations included the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and the Smell Identification Test (SIT) utilizing 16 Sniffin’ Sticks. Objective assessments included the Modified Lund-Kennedy (LK) endoscopic scoring system and the Lund-Mackay (LM) scoring system based on computed tomography scans. Evaluations were conducted preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 6 months, with LM scores recorded at baseline and again at the 6-month follow-up. Results: The study cohort consisted of 21 patients, including 11 females and 10 males, with a mean age of 41.67 ± 11.93 years. Preoperative mean scores were as follows: SNOT-22 (48.10 ± 4.40), LK (4.10 ± 0.26), LM (10.48 ± 1.62), and SIT (8.00 ± 4.06). Statistically significant improvements were observed postoperatively across all parameters (P = 0.001). However, no significant differences in outcomes were identified based on the duration of follow-up or the number of previous sinus surgeries, specifically for the SNOT-22, LK, and LM scores. Conclusion: Revision full-house FESS resulted in significant improvement in both subjective and objective outcome measures over a 6-month follow-up period. These findings suggest that this surgical approach is an effective and reliable option for managing patients with recurrent CRS, offering notable enhancement in quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qadir et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: