This approach develops a numerical model for axial stress–strain in FRP-confined concrete, suggesting effective evaluation methods.
A numerical method is proposed for evaluating the axial stress–strain relationship of FRP-confined concrete. In this method, empirical formulae for the compressive strength and strain at peak stress of confined concrete are obtained by fitting experimental data collected from the literature. It is then assumed that when FRP-confined concrete and actively confined concrete are subjected to the same lateral strain and confining pressure at a specific loading stage, their axial stress–strain relationships are identical at that stage. Based on this assumption, a numerical method for the axial stress–strain relationship of FRP-confined concrete is developed by combining the stress–strain model of actively confined concrete with the axial–lateral strain correlation. Finally, the validity of this numerical method is verified with experimental data with various geometric and material parameters, demonstrating a reasonable agreement between predicted stress–strain curves and measured ones. A parametric analysis is conducted to reveal that the stress–strain curve is independent of the specimen length for strong FRP confinement with small failure strains, while the specimen length exhibits a significant effect on the softening branch for weak FRP confinement. Therefore, for weakly FRP-confined concrete, it is recommended to consider the specimen length effect in evaluating the axial stress–strain relationship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Min et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: