Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental analysis shows how submerged macrophyte coverage stabilizes water quality during ammonium pulses, highlighting critical thresholds.
Climate change intensifies nutrient pulses through extreme rainfall and agricultural runoff, yet the buffering capacity of submerged macrophytes against such disturbances remains unquantified. Through a large-scale enclosure experiment simulating ammonium pulses (1.24 mg/L NH4-N), we tested how submerged macrophytes coverage (SMC, 0-100%) modulates water quality, ecosystem resilience, and regime shifts (from clear to turbid). The system's buffering capacity and resilience stability increased significantly with SMC, whereas its recovery stability decreased. High SMC (>50%) accelerated NH4-N removal (96 h vs 168 h in controls), suppressed phytoplankton blooms (Chl-a increase: 102.5% vs 237.4%), and sustained clear water. Conversely, low and medium SMC (<50%) did not prevent transitions to algal-dominated states. Furthermore, NH4-N stress was inversely correlated with SMC, and persistently high NH4-N at low SMC increased macrophyte degradation risk. Structural equation modeling revealed that macrophytes-mediated nutrient competition and light stabilization underpinned these effects. Additionally, we identify a critical SMC threshold (39-51%) to mitigate pulse impacts─a finding urgently needed to guide lake restoration in a changing climate. This work bridges the gap between pulse ecology and adaptive management, offering actionable strategies for SDG 6 (Clean Water) and 13 (Climate Action).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: